Comments on: SC Finds Some Portions of EO 464 Unconstitutional (Updated) http://blipsnetwork.com/2006/ink/they-say-sc-finds-eo-464-unconstitutional/ The Byte, Life, Ink, Pixel, and Sound Network Thu, 08 Dec 2011 11:56:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Arbet http://blipsnetwork.com/2006/ink/they-say-sc-finds-eo-464-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-293 Arbet Fri, 21 Apr 2006 00:05:52 +0000 http://awbholdings.com/blog/?p=155#comment-293 Unfortunately, that is true. However, what the SC did was allowed by the Charter. The courts can invalidate laws in full or in part. Unfortunately, that is true. However, what the SC did was allowed by the Charter. The courts can invalidate laws in full or in part.

]]> By: juan makabayan http://blipsnetwork.com/2006/ink/they-say-sc-finds-eo-464-unconstitutional/comment-page-1/#comment-292 juan makabayan Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:33:05 +0000 http://awbholdings.com/blog/?p=155#comment-292 Hi Arbet, So is it a unanimous 'split' decision? should be simply 'unconstitutional'. an apple is either rotten or not rotten, why slice it and say which is good and which portion is rotten. That is a rotten decision. Hi Arbet,

So is it a unanimous ‘split’ decision? should be simply ‘unconstitutional’. an apple is either rotten or not rotten, why slice it and say which is good and which portion is rotten. That is a rotten decision.

]]>