27
May

The Da Vinci Code Bashfest

Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code had stirred a minor controversy when it was released years ago. The movie is far more controversial, and most thinking people asked – what’s the fuss?

Here’s a roundup of the blogosphere’s comments on the book, the movie, and the controversy. My reactions later.

I have never read the book, nor seen the movie. So I won’t comment on those two. I’d rather deal with the overblown, sensationalized, and irrational reactions made regarding the movie.

Those members of the clergy who called for the ban of the movie are insulting their parishioners when they called for the ban. The call implies that the laity cannot distinguish fact from fiction, that their faith is brittle enough to be easily persuaded by a work of fiction.

The actions of the officials of Legaspi City and Manila are, at best, irrational. DJB has rightly termed City Hall – the Taliban City Council. The Constitution specifically states that the State shall not prefer any religion, yet City Hall acted as if the movie was an affront to the official religion! I agree with DJB, their actions are culpable violations of the Constitution!

The MTRCB thought that it had made a Solomonic decision when it gave the movie R-18 rating, in order to please both sides. Well, you can buy the DVD/VCD later on, or read the book. So whether they ban it or give it a restricted rating, it doesn’t matter. So there’s nothing Solomonic about the decision.

The DVD/bookburning is the most extreme expression of irrationality and silliness regarding this issue. Reminds me of the Inquisition – one of the blackest stains in the history of the Roman Catholic Church. And that controversy about the Rizal Bill. What’s next? Burning Dan Brown at the stake? Behead him?

And the naysayers had given the movie so much publicity. So the more they ranted, the more watched the movie out of curiousity. Very nice. Rant all they want, and Dan Brown laughs his way to the bank (yeah, I know, cliche).

This issue has made one thing clear to me – we as a nation are vacillating between two extremes: tradition with its conformity, and modernity, which calls for challenging all known norms and beliefs. We know now that the traditionalists in general do not trust that we ordinary folks can think for ourselves. What a shame, indeed. What an insult.

The REAL Da Vinci Code:

In VB.NET:

Namespace DVC

Public Class DaVinciCode
Inherits HolyBloodHolyGrail

‘ Set values, later to be overridden by Dan Brown method
Private monksInOpusDei As Boolean = False
Private jesusMarriedMaryMagdalene As Boolean = False
Private existenceOfPrioryOfZion As Boolean = False
Private bibleCollatedByConstantine As Boolean = False
Private nicaeaCreatedDivinityOfChrist As Boolean = False
Private gospelsLaterEditedToSupportClaims As Boolean = False
Private cupMissingFromLastSupper As Boolean = False
Private saintJohnNotInPicture As Boolean = False

Public Sub Book()

While (peopleWillingToBelieveAnything And christianBashingAcceptable)
bookSales = bookSales + 1
movieHype = movieHype + 1
danBrownsBankAccount = danBrownsBankAccount + 1
historicalAccuracy = historicalAccuracy – 1
artHistoryAccuracy = artHistoryAccuracy – 1
skepticism = skepticism – 1
badWriting = badWriting + 1
If (asLongAsItIsNotTheVirginMary) Then divineFeminineSupport = divineFeminineSupport + 1
Dim mainStreamMediaChallengeCredibility As Boolean = False
Dim excuse As String = “It’s a fictional book”
Dim action As String = “Spend hours writing to debunking books complaining that ” & excuse
Dim seeContradictionSpendingTimeDefendingFiction As Boolean = False
For Each outlet As media In mainStreamMedia
Dim freePublicity As Boolean = True
Dim notPointOutObviousFlaws As Boolean = True
Dim dontOffendMuslimsAtAllCosts As Boolean = True
Dim christianBashingOkayThough As Boolean = True
Dim misrepresentOpusDei As Boolean = True
Dim askIsJusticeScaliaAMember As Boolean = True

Next
End While

End Sub
End Class

End Namespace

In C#:

namespace DVC
{
class DaVinciCode : HolyBloodHolyGrail
{
// Set values, later to be overridden by Dan Brown method
bool monksInOpusDei = false;
bool jesusMarriedMaryMagdalene = false;
bool existenceOfPrioryOfZion = false;
bool bibleCollatedByConstantine = false;
bool nicaeaCreatedDivinityOfChrist = false;
bool gospelsLaterEditedToSupportClaims = false;
bool cupMissingFromLastSupper = false;
bool saintJohnNotInPicture = false;

public void Book()
{
while (peopleWillingToBelieveAnything && christianBashingAcceptable)
{
bookSales++;
movieHype++;
danBrownsBankAccount++;
historicalAccuracy–;
artHistoryAccuracy–;
skepticism–;
badWriting++;

if (asLongAsItIsNotTheVirginMary)
divineFeminineSupport++;

mainStreamMediaChallengeCredibility = false;

string excuse = “It’s a fictional book”;
string action = “Spend hours writing to debunking books complaining that ”
+ excuse;
bool seeContradictionSpendingTimeDefendingFiction = false;
foreach (media outlet in mainStreamMedia)
{
bool freePublicity = true;
bool notPointOutObviousFlaws = true;
bool dontOffendMuslimsAtAllCosts = true;
bool christianBashingOkayThough = true;
bool misrepresentOpusDei = true;
bool askIsJusticeScaliaAMember = true;
}
}
}

}
}

26
May

Smart Bill Just Shrunked

No, I am not talking about my Smart bill being less than before (how I wish, but with 12% RVAT, that’s wishful thinking). It’s the current bill sent in a significantly smaller envelop, thus shrinking the bill itself. Cost-cutting action, yes. Maybe Smart has already realized that it will be harder for them to sustain the glorious growth of the last five years.

25
May

AFP Conducting Fishing-Like Arrests

A news item (relegated to the Metro section) last Tuesday stated that five supporters of Joseph Estrada were abducted by armed men last Monday. Then yesterday, Eduardo Ermita denies the administration had a hand in the said abduction. Even if it was done by the military, Ermita was quick to wash hands, saying that “These are operational matters that you don’t expect the Palace to have knowledge of.” It is either he is lying, or the Fortress by the Pasig is not in control of the AFP and the ISAFP. Or both?

Hours after that interview with Ermita, the AFP has admitted taking the five men. These men were then charged with rebellion, for allegedly trying to assassinate four Cabinet members.

I have several issues regarding this. One, Why did it take them 2 days before admitting that they have in their custody the five men? Why did it take them 2 days to file charges if they have evidence at hand? I mean, they can’t just “arrest” them without even having any evidence of wrongdoing. Which brings me to the next point.

The seemingly arbitrary arrest made, and the way it was made, should be of concern to all citizens of this country. There should be an outcry. Legal groups should butt in, investigate, and file charges if they found something wrong. For if military can just arrest anyone anytime and anyhow they like, we should be very scared, indeed.

Another point: is assassinating a government official synonymous with rebellion? Since when? Or maybe the news report was badly written?

And I find this sickening, from ABS-CBN News:

Kison, however, was not clear about whether the arrest of the five was covered by warrants. All he said was that charges against Dionisio are pending with the Department of Justice. The four others were rounded up because they were with Dionisio. (emphasis mine)

Also, all rebellion charges filed by this administration this year are all based on eyewitnesses – one eyewitness per case. These cases will turn to I-say-he-says type of cases – flimsy at best. They will all hinge on the character of the witness, and that will be a problem.

Again, since this case doesn’t affect the majority – and their interests are not at stake – they will just ignore this case. Will it embolden the Fortress by the Pasig do push the envelop further? It seems that the three Supreme Court decisions released this month were not enough deterrents for the Fortress; as I have stated somewhere else, those decisions were like slapping a child’s wrists with marshmallow sticks (Justice Isagani Cruz was more restrained when he used the word “felt slippers”). With the seeming apathy, and a paper-tiger SC, expect Gloria Arroyo and her joke court to push the envelop further, until it hurts every one. And hopefully it won’t be too late by then.

17
May

Antispam Company Folds After Spam Attack

Wired News has reported that an Israeli antispam company had decided to close shop after a vicious spam attack that took down its database server and several other sites:

In an interview with Wired News, Blue Security CEO Eran Reshef said the Israel-based company was closing its service Wednesday since he did not want to be responsible for an ever-escalating war that could bring down internet service providers and websites around the world and subject its users to denial-of-service attacks from a well-organized group in control of a massive army of computer drones.

“Our community would very much like us to continue on the fight against spam, and our community has grown over the last week,” Reshef said. “But at the end of the day if we continue doing so, within a few days, major websites will go down. I don’t feel that this is something I can be responsible for. I cannot go ahead and rip up the internet to make Blue Security work. This is not the decision a commercial entity can make.”

A concerted effort against spam should be taken by all concerned. It’s getting out of hand. For a day, I receive about 120 spam emails in my Yahoo! account; I do not even dare take a look at my Gmail account’s spam box, since that email address is what I usually use in online services and fora.

17
May

Bits and Pieces, ExpectoRants Style

Just odds and ends, presented Expectorants style:

  • On the murder of Bayan Muna leaders: the consecutive murders of Bayan Muna leaders are troubling. The AFP and the PNP and the Fortress by the Pasig (care of Norberto Gonzales) advance the idea of a purge – communists killing communists. I find this idea troubling and unbelievable. For one, the Communist Party of the Philippines had indeed conducted purges during the 1980s, which dealt a blow to its reputation and probably caused decline in membership. So why do it again? While it will cleanse the organization, it will only damage their reputation and deter others from joining. In this point it is illogical for the CPP hierarchy to order such action. Unless the CPP is now headed by a group of illogical persons.

    Also, it is the duty of the State to protect its citizens. Murders such as these are failures of the State in protecting its citizens. It also shows that there is a failure in the government’s maintenance of law and order. Or, this administration no longer considers Bayan Muna members as citizens of this country. So what if it is a purge? It is still murder, a crime defined under the Revised Penal Code. The PNP must resolve the cases, as it is their duty.

    And also, once and for all, Bayan Muna and similar organizations must categorically deny that they are affiliated with CPPand its armed wing.

  • The Internet was usually a reliable source of information. Not anymore.

    Jon Mariano wondered how come GMA has appointed more than 15 justices in the Supreme Court, with no retiring justice until the end of the year.

    The culprit is the ABS-CBN News item that he had read: Palace names 4 Supreme Court justices. Another article was published, this time correctly noting that the appointees were for the Court of Appeals: Court of Appeals has 4 new justices. How I wish ABS-CBN Interactive had issued an erratum.

  • Miriam Santiago has proven time and again that principles and beliefs can change. Whether due to enlightenment or plain balimbing, I don’t know. As long as we elect people like her, expect a banana republic for the years to come.
  • Justice in this country is really weird and unpredictable. Members of the Parents Enabling Parents Coalition, an organization of parents who bought education plans from the besieged Pacific Plans, were charged with 13 counts of libel at 9 regional trial courts, and arrest warrants were issued. Imagine, the company who had somehow conducted their business badly had the gall to charge their customers with a criminal case! Talk about justice!

    It seems that the libel case stems from several comments made in their Web forum. Now I have issues with this, being a netizen and a maintainer of a Web site. Suppose someone posted a comment in this blog maligning someone else. Should I be charged with libel? Should I be held responsible for someone else’s post in my Web site?

    Now, some might argue that I should be responsible enough to delete comments like these. But would that constitute violation of the Bill of Rights? But then again, some might retort that not all rights are absolute, which would now turn this argument into a chicken-or-egg debate.

    I do not believe in censorship and libel. And if the facts of the case are true, then the said libel suit doesn’t wash. Sub judice, so end of story.

15
May

Giving the Poor a Bad Name (a personal story)

This story will surely send those poor-bashing people gloating: “I told you so”.

My uncle bought a house and lot at Novaliches a decade ago. Back then, the area was OK, lots of empty spaces, with a much better water supply compared to the former place where my late grandmother had lived. So the paperworks were OK, money changed hands, and my grandmother moved into the new place with joy in her heart – her own home, at last. No more rents, no more water supply woes.

The land adjacent to it was vacant at that time. Then the owner began building a house, which is still incomplete after more than 5 years. It is already full of weeds. The land in front of both lots was empty when my uncle’s house (which he gave to my grandmother) was bought. Then the troubles began.

The area is actually full of squatters. The heaven-sent water supply was actually a Trojan horse. While the house indeed have a legal water connection, there is an illegal tap in the yard, and unfortunately it was the “poso ng bayan” (artesian well for the squatters). My grandmother, being a conscientious citizen, cut the illegal tap. Imagine the reactions of the people residing in the squatters area.

The electricity connection is another problem. The meter and the main switch were several meters away from the house, giving my grandmother severe apprehensions that someone would tap on the line. Throughout her lifetime, this never happened.

Then the worst happened. The lot in front was bought by somebody, and immediately built walls around it. The wide expanse that led to my grandmother’s house was reduced to a severely narrow alley, where a single person can pass through. This increased her anxiety; she was specially afraid of fire by then. Also, the number of squatter dwellers increased, further increasing my grandmother’s anxiety. There were times when stones hit the roof. Being a light sleeper, my grandmother spent a lot of sleepless nights.

Then her health became poorer, and she was in the hospital for almost six months. The doctors never found out what’s wrong with her. The family attended to her round the clock; she couldn’t speak. They had to tie her hands to the bed railings, since she kept on pulling out the IV lines, the oxygen line, and every contraptions that the doctors had placed in her. It was a sad moment every minute. She always wanted to go home; you ask her if she want to and she would try to sit up, which she couldn’t by that time.

She died two hours after the New Year of 2003.

And so my uncle got married a year ago, and his family resided in that house, together with an aunt who’s an old maid. Then my uncle left to South Korea to work (as always), and the troubles began. The squatter dwellers approached my aunt and asked if they could get water from the illegal tap. My aunt behemently refused. And a few days later a person from Maynilad came and accused my aunt of using the illegal tap, and threatened to have her jailed. Anxiously she asked for our help, and we had to tell her not to panic, since it was obviously an empty threat. Coincidence, perhaps.

Then just two weeks ago, Meralco men swooped up on the area and cut illegal connections. The squatter dwellers suspected my uncle’s wife for ratting them, and began threatening her. It came to a point when a certain man threatened to lob a grenade on the house. This sent my uncle’s wife into an anxious frenzy, and in the middle of the storm named Caloy, abandoned the house and went somewhere.

The family had long been contemplating on selling the house and lot. But with all the inconveniences of the place, we were not able to sell it, since the buyers priced it low – wower than the price that my uncle had paid for it. He is now contemplating of selling it at a loss.

That’s the price of living within the bounds of the law. That’s the price of living with those who give the other poor a bad name. That’s the price of not believing in the Filipino value called “pakikisama”. Sometimes we really cannot blame the upper class (including the middle class) if they treat the poor with disdain.

Now the extended family is beginning to pack things, and leave that place ASAP, as my uncle had ordered via phone. It is a retreat, a retreat that I believe is uncalled for, since we are on the right; why should we surrender to the law breakers? Why be afraid of empty threats? In the end, this cowardice will only embolden the fools to push the limits of their lawbreaking activities.

The barangay is a useless contraption in this case. Don’t tell us – we already did tell them, but all for naught. It should be abolished for being useless.


Personal Note: I had not cried when my grandmother died, not even during the funeral and the burial. There is a paragraph in Simon Birch that resonates to my case – that when someone dies, you lose that person slowly, by missing a lot of things: the smell of her clothes, her laughter, her voice. Only when you miss them all, you begin to know that she’s gone.

I was typing this with tears welling up in my eyes. Only last year did the death of my grandmother made its impact on me. When I was at the cemetery painting her tomb. During her birth anniversaries. During New Year. And now, today.

7
May

SpyCar – Test Your Anti-Spyware

Try SpyCar and test if your anti-spyware is capable enough of protecting your computer. Note that pattern based anti-spyware might score low in this test.

Read the EULA carefully before starting the test.

5
May

The Love Bug – Six Years After

May 4, 2000 – six years ago yesterday – email servers crashed when a flood of emails clogged them. And the Philippines was again on the center of the map of notoriety – the Love Bug (Trend Micro: VBS_LOVELETTER, Symantec: VBS.LoveLetter) was traced to a certain student named Onel de Guzman.

De Guzman was not convicted of any crime, since no relevant law that covers his crime exist at that time. An effect of his mischievousness is the passage of the E-Commerce Act. He remains free. I wonder where he is now.

This worm started the rise of social engineering as a means to spread malware. And now, this era is ending, with cybercrime, identity theft, and spyware fast becoming a problem.

5
May

PNP Does a Nuremberg

In the aftermath of David v. Gloria Arroyo, which had condemned the specific actions of the executive department in the name of Proclamation 1017, the Philippine National Police, through its spokesman, has said that the police was just following orders. This line of defense was first employed during the Nuremberg Trials. Called the Nuremberg Defense, wherein the primary reasoning is that a soldier is just following orders and should not be held responsible for such acts.

Mr. Samuel Pagdilao, PNP spokesman, said “These were not done by the PNP to its liking. We were just following the proclamation.” Which means one thing – the PNP is now passing the buck to the Fortress by the Pasig. And that is why Mr. Eduardo Nachura and his men are studying whether to appeal David v. Ermita, since obviously, the problem will fall in the laps of Gloria Arroyo. I see Nachura’s action as looking for an escape route for Arroyo.

Also, Mr. Vidal Querol, head of NCR police, was interviewed at ANC. He was trying to advance another escape route by trying to point out that the arrests of Randolf David and Ronald Llamas on February 24, 2006, were legal and were made because of violations of Batas Pambansa 880, the subject of another SC decision Bayan v. Ermita. Let me quote the ABS-CBN News:

“Kapag binasa nating mabuti ‘yan [SC ruling] ang sinasabi ay bawal po ang pag-aresto kung hindi ang dahilan ay lawless violence, invasion, rebellion, and violation of Batas Pambansa 880 (If we read the ruling properly, it says that it is prohibited to conduct arrests unless there is lawless violence, invasion, rebellion and violation of Batas Pambansa 880),” he said.

Mr. Querol is now equating lawless violence with violations of BP880. I will leave that for lawyers to debate on. But the SC has already stated that the arrests of David and Llamas were illegal and unconstitutional. Let me quote the decision:

In the Brief Account submitted by petitioner David, certain facts are established: first, he was arrested without warrant; second, the PNP operatives arrested him on the basis of PP 1017; third, he was brought at Camp Karingal, Quezon City where he was fingerprinted, photographed and booked like a criminal suspect; fourth, he was treated brusquely by policemen who “held his head and tried to push him” inside an unmarked car; fifth, he was charged with Violation of Batas Pambansa Bilang No. 880 and Inciting to Sedition; sixth, he was detained for seven (7) hours; and seventh, he was eventually released for insufficiency of evidence.
xxx
On the basis of the relevant and uncontested facts narrated earlier, it is also pristine clear that (1) the warrantless arrest of petitioners Randolf S. David and Ronald Llamas; (2) the dispersal of the rallies and warrantless arrest of the KMU and NAFLU-KMU members; (3) the imposition of standards on media or any prior restraint on the press; and (4) the warrantless search of the Tribune offices and the whimsical seizures of some articles for publication and other materials, are not authorized by the Constitution, the law and jurisprudence. Not even by the valid provisions of PP 1017 and G.O. No. 5.
xxx
The warrantless arrest of Randolf S. David and Ronald Llamas; the dispersal and warrantless arrest of the KMU and NAFLU-KMU members during their rallies, in the absence of proof that these petitioners were committing acts constituting lawless violence, invasion or rebellion and violating BP 880; the imposition of standards on media or any form of prior restraint on the press, as well as the warrantless search of the Tribune offices and whimsical seizure of its articles for publication and other materials, are declared UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

Mr. Querol is effectively saying that the SC was wrong. I dare say that he was spewing those words to defend the police from prosecution and probable conviction on violations of human rights. I challenge Mr. Querol to express his opinion through the Solicitor General in an appeal to the Supreme Court, instead of going to the media trying to convince people through subterfuge.

Another defense, as advanced by Mr. Pagdilao, is that the police acted in good faith and its actions were done in “prudent and scrupulous observance” of the rule of law and human rights, as quoted in INQ7.net. Rule of law? Scrupulous observance of human rights? Didn’t the Supreme Court just said that the acts of the police during Proc. 1017 were unconstitutional? I think a thorough retraining of the entire PNP is needed.

(Personally, I am happy I was not in the shoes of Ricky Carandang when he was interviewing Querol. It’s hard to restrain oneself when hearing someone spewing lies with a straight face. BTW, Mr. Carandang has not posted in a while, thus you will not see any post on his home page.)

Should we expect heads to roll? Should we expect fall guys to be paraded? Nope. Even the Fortress by the Pasig was not sorry about the issue.


I find it lamentable that the lawyers of the petitioners in David v. Arroyo did not even contest the facts that the government specified that lead to the issuance of Proc. 1017. This made the Supreme Court uphold the proclamation. That’s what the petitioner’s lawyers should explain. Atty. Aceron lamented this fact.

3
May

SC: Proc. 1017 Constitutional

Have just began reading the decision. By just reading the statement of facts you would know how the Court had decided. This, for me, is the deciding point:

During the oral arguments held on March 7, 2006, the Solicitor General specified the facts leading to the suance of PP 1017 and G.O. No. 5. Significantly, there was no refutation from petitioners’ counsels. (Emphasis made by the Court)

And thus, the Court says:

Petitioners failed to show that President Arroyo’s exercise of the calling-out power, by issuing PP 1017, is totally bereft of factual basis. A reading of the Solicitor General’s Consolidated Comment and Memorandum shows a detailed narration of the events leading to the issuance of PP 1017, with supporting reports forming part of the records. Mentioned are the escape of the Magdalo Group, their audacious threat of the Magdalo D-Day, the defections in the military, particularly in the Philippine Marines, and the reproving statements from the communist leaders. There was also the Minutes of the Intelligence Report and Security Group of the Philippine Army showing the growing alliance between the NPA and the military. Petitioners presented nothing to refute such events. Thus, absent any contrary allegations, the Court is convinced that the President was justified in issuing PP 1017 calling for military aid.

The SC has decided that Proc. 1017 was constitutional pertaining to its provisions calling on the police and the military to prevent or suppress violence. Parts of the said proclamation calling on the military to enforce laws not related to lawless violence as well as decrees promulgated by the President are deemed unconstitutional.

WHEREFORE, the Petitions are partly granted. The Court rules that PP 1017 is CONSTITUTIONAL insofar as it constitutes a call by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo on the AFP to prevent or suppress lawless violence. However, the provisions of PP 1017 commanding the AFP to enforce laws not related to lawless violence, as well as decrees promulgated by the President, are declared UNCONSTITUTIONAL. In addition, the provision in PP 1017 declaring national emergency under Section 17, Article VII of the Constitution is CONSTITUTIONAL, but such declaration does not authorize the President to take over privately-owned public utility or business affected with public interest without prior legislation.

G.O. No. 5 is CONSTITUTIONAL since it provides a standard by which the AFP and the PNP should implement PP 1017, i.e. whatever is “necessary and appropriate actions and measures to suppress and prevent acts of lawless violence.” Considering that “acts of terrorism” have not yet been defined and made punishable by the Legislature, such portion of G.O. No. 5 is declared UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

The warrantless arrest of Randolf S. David and Ronald Llamas; the dispersal and warrantless arrest of the KMU and NAFLU-KMU members during their rallies, in the absence of proof that these petitioners were committing acts constituting lawless violence, invasion or rebellion and violating BP 880; the imposition of standards on media or any form of prior restraint on the press, as well as the warrantless search of the Tribune offices and whimsical seizure of its articles for publication and other materials, are declared UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

As usual, the decision ended with partial granting of petitions, as the Court did with the other issues. Solomonic? Yeah. Arroyo et al getting a slap in the wrists – using marshmallow sticks.