13
May

You only live once, so get the most out of food

Well, you know the story. You just came from work, you live alone at home, and you are hungry. What’s to eat is a universal question, and bachelors are not exempted. A bachelor always has two choices: cook or eat out.

This blog is born to help bachelors in making their day-to-day (or night-to-night) food decisions. If a bachelor (that might be you) chooses to brave the kitchen, what can he cook with ease, within a tight budget, and have some semblance of taste? If he chooses to go out and eat, where is the best place to get crispy pata (Manuel L. Quezon III’s favorite, based on Twitter)? If you are a bachelor who lives alone and if you grapple with food issues all the time, then this blog might be for you.

The bloggers behind this blog will present you with easy-to-cook, outrageous, and out-of-this-world recipes, if you choose to do the cooking yourself. And if you are craving for the best siopao in the metro, we will try looking for it for you. We will be asking you where to get the best food, and we will try it out. If we are satisfied, we will feature it.

We will try to post healthy recipes/food trips, but being bachelors, who cares, right? You only live once, so get the most out of food. That is our philosophy (until we reach the age of forty, or our blood pressure is 190/100, or we get married, whichever comes first), and we hope we could impart it through this blog.

Bon appetit!

12
May

Earning brownie points at Meralco’s expense

Members of the Government Service Insurance System should sue Winston Garcia for outright stupidity. And for acting against their best interest.

GSIS takes “contributions” from government employees every month, and GSIS invests these so that it can provide pension and death benefits to its members and their beneficiaries. GSIS holds a stake at the electricity distribution monopoly. A company declares dividends (in cash or stock) when a company has surplus earnings. So whenever Meralco declares dividends, the GSIS earns.

meralco logoThat is why I am astounded by Garcia’s complaint that the Meralco rates are high, and that Meralco is overcharging its customers. See news reports here (ABS-CBN), here (GMA), and here (PDI).

As general manager of GSIS, Garcia’s primary concern should be the money of its members. His main tasks are to ensure that the members’ funds are in good hands, invest these funds soundly, and pay benefits on time. In short, he works for the interests of GSIS members. Isn’t it for the best interests of GSIS members if Meralco pays high dividends? Will it not benefit GSIS members if there is a large return on investment (ROI)?

As a member of Meralco’s Board of Directors, Garcia has a say on Meralco’s direction. And if he claims that the government owns 35% of Meralco, they why did he and other government directors allow Meralco to operate as it is operating now? And if he claims that Meralco is deliberately witholding documents from him, why can’t he just oust the current management team instead of saber rattling in the media?

I don’t think his comparison between Meralco and VECO should even be given credence. Unless he can prove that Meralco and VECO are both apples, the comparison is unfair. Besides, who owns VECO? Read this:

VECO is owned and managed by the Aboitiz and Garcia families of Cebu.

And Winston is part of that Garcia families. So there.

I agree that electricity rates are high. There are many factors to consider why we have high rates, and one of them is the high cost of crude oil. To that, we can’t do anything; it’s market forces at work. Also, your electricity bill includes VAT. So technically, you are being VATed several times on just one bill: oil is subject to VAT, electricity is subject to VAT, even systems loss is subject to VAT.

And there, this regime can do something, but it won’t. It can reduce the VAT rate to 10%, but it won’t. Because the finances of this regime depends on the taxes that we all pay. So it wants Meralco to lower its rates; I suggest that this regime instead revert the VAT rate for oil and power to 10%. Asa pa ko.

What the regime did was to lower Napocor’s rates. Did you know why we had RVAT? The law that slapped us 12% tax on almost everything we buy? Back in 2004, as par of her win-at-all-costs strategy, Gloria Arroyo lowered Napocor’s rates. The net effect was ballooning of Napocor’s debts, most of which were guaranteed by the government. It brought about budget deficit, and to cover such deficit, we got 12% VAT. Currently, Napocor’s debt is worth half a trillion pesos, which we poor Pinoys are paying through our taxes. And lowering such rates will not help easing that debt. Short-term, we might have a lower electricity bill, but long-term, we are burying three generations of Pinoys in debt.

Meralco should instead counter the regime’s propaganda with transparency. Open its books without reservation and qualification. If it has nothing to hide, it should have nothing to fear. But wait. The truth shall not set you free here in this country. Just ask all of those whistleblowers out there.

I suggest you read Tongue In, Anew’s Meralco v. Mafia for a technical background on Meralco’s current political woes. It should also give you some insight on the regime’s (and its factotums Garcia, Ermita, Bunye, etc) possible motivation for attacking Meralco.

11
May

Happy mother’s day 2008!

Arbet and mom

That’s me and my mom (her name is Bernadette, but relatives and friends call her Bebot), decades ago. I think I was in elementary school when this picture was taken – late 1980s.

To all the mothers in the world, and most specially to my mom (I heart my mom): happy mother’s day!

Aileen Apolo
Liz Cochico
Noemi Dado
Dine Racoma
Janette Toral

10
May

Me as little loser

That is how it would look like if I were made to be a little loser graphic. And most prolly no one would buy a shirt with my face on it. What a loser.

Last Tuesday, David and Goliath launched in the Philippines a new line of shirts called Little Losers. This line of shirt features graphic images about character stereotypes imbued with David and Goliath’s sense of humor. And what better way to launch it than a night of losers coming together, laughing at the antics of an improv group? That’s what happened at Mag:Net Cafe at Bonifacio High Street, with the Silly People Improv Theater (SPIT) leading the losers.

The head loser that night was Gabe Mercado (who my mom likes), who kept everyone laughing with his jokes. He was ably helped by the other losers from SPIT. And there’s no better fun than fun at the expense of others (yeah, I know, I’m mean). The best way to do this is through games. Just ask the three sets of people who were made to kiss Kenneth the Mr. Fart Face. The most kissed part? The elbow. Wacky, I know.

And then the Chicken Mafia striked again.

Fresh from their success at iBlog, the gang infiltrated the losers to prove that the people there were losers. Shedding his chicken suit, Arthur (aka Philos) mowed the audience with his “stupid” questions, and he was rewarded with laughters. Embarrassing? He did went home with a prize, so guess who’s laughing when the event was over? Mission accomplished for Chicken Mafia.

Anyway, you can get a Little Loser shirt (for men and women) for Php 995 at their stores in Bonifacio High Street, Powerplant Mall, TriNoma, Robinsons Place Manila Midtown, Greenbelt 5, and Rustan’s Makati.

Pictures:


Me at the Fotoloco booth

The Chicken Mafia at the Fotoloco booth

(photos taken using Nokia N93)

And here’s a video taken after the event by Jeff Teknostik using Nokia N93:
Continue reading

5
May

On blogging, code of ethics, and credibility

The problem with Dean Luis Teodoro’s assertion is that he is assuming that blogging is a form of a journalism. If he meant “subset” then I would have agreed. What he wanted to happen is to apply journalism ethics and principles on blogging. Why apply these principles when you are only talking about, for example, how you ended up being pathetic? You mean, I have to follow the inverted pyramid whatever and interview my mom, my dad, my friends, to get their sides when all I wanted to say is that I’m ugly?

Teodoro doesn’t seem to have a firm grasp of what blogging is. Well, in fairness to him, we can’t say that for certain; it is just conjecture based on his opinion, and on how the report was presented. The report cited Brian Gorrell and that Cebu rectal surgery scandal as two prime examples of what could go wrong online. Aside from sweeping statements made by Teodoro, he is assuming that blogs are newspaper-like Web sites.

I guess what he means is that bloggers who are presenting information should at least adhere to a certain standard; he should have qualified his argument instead of that sweeping statement that betrays his ignorance. What Teodoro did not know is that there were several efforts to have a code of ethics for bloggers, and all of them bogged down. The reason is simple: it is not enforceable. The technical issues alone are mind-boggling, to say it simply.

Maybe it is time for the UP College of Mass Communications to offer classes on blogging. (And no, I won’t even point out the irony in that report. If you are a journalist, you should see it.)

It all boils down to a blogger’s credibility. How can one be credible? While we cannot have a code of ethics for blogger, each blogger can adhere to his/her own code. A blogger can, for example, write a page stating what he/she would and would not do when blogging. A blogger can say that he/she would do everything to ensure that what would be presented is true and fair. And when that blogger adheres to that self-subscribed code, readers would know, and earns their trust and respect. And credibility.

(Will edit this soon.)

2
May

One for Bloggers Da Who

Well, not really, but I found it really funny. Sorry, Bloggers Da Who.

Found this at the April 30, 2008 issue of Commuter Express (formerly Manila Standard Express):

(With apologies to The Jester-in-Exile.)

2
May

I am a coward

I am such a coward.

I believe some bloggers were expecting fireworks at a previous event, but nothing of that sort happened. Why? Because I am a coward.

Honestly, I knew nothing would come out of it. If that person is worth his salt, all that person would say is “no comment.” Most probably that person’s lawyer has already sternly instructed that person to shut up. So yeah, it would be pretty useless.

Also, we have to use the word “alleged” when we refer to that person. And there’s the rub. We keep on attaching the “alleged” tag, when most likely that person is guilty. After all, that person tried to derail administrative proceedings, right? After all, that person refused to cooperate with the authorities, right? If that person is not guilty, shouldn’t that person exert all effort to clear his/her name?

All things being said, I am still a coward.